S. Armijo-olivo, C. R. Stiles, N. A. Hagen, P. D. Biondo, and G. G. Cummings, Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research, J. Eval. Clin. Pract, vol.18, issue.1, pp.12-18, 2012.

L. Bero, What is in a name? Nonfinancial influences on the outcomes of systematic reviews and guidelines, J. Clin. Epidemiol, vol.67, issue.11, pp.1239-1241, 2014.

L. Bero, Addressing bias and conflict of interest among biomedical researchers, JAMA, vol.317, issue.17, pp.1723-1724, 2017.

L. A. Bero and Q. Grundy, Why having a (nonfinancial) interest is not a conflict of interest, PLoS Biol, vol.14, issue.12, p.2001221, 2016.

A. Bilandzic, T. Fitzpatrick, L. Rosella, and D. Henry, Risk of bias in systematic reviews of non-randomized studies of adverse cardiovascular effects of thiazolidinediones and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors: application of a new Cochrane risk of bias tool, PLoS Med, vol.13, issue.4, p.1001987, 2016.

A. Burdorf, Identification of determinants of exposure: consequences for measurement and control strategies, Occup. Environ. Med, vol.62, issue.5, pp.344-350, 2005.

A. Cattaneo, A. Somigliana, and M. Gemmi, Airborne concentrations of chrysotile asbestos in serpentine quarries and stone processing facilities in Valmalenco, Ann Occup Hyg, vol.56, issue.6, pp.671-683, 2012.

B. R. Da-costa, B. Beckett, and A. Diaz, Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study, Syst Rev, vol.6, issue.1, p.44, 2017.

A. Descatha, G. Sembajwe, and M. Baer, WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: protocol for systematic reviews of exposure to long working hours and of the effect of exposure to long working hours on stroke, Environ. Int, vol.19, pp.366-378, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01900999

J. Fleiss, Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters, Psychol. Bull, vol.76, issue.5, pp.378-382, 1971.

P. Gies, K. Glanz, D. O'riordan, T. Elliott, and E. Nehl, Measured occupational solar UVR exposures of lifeguards in pool settings, Am. J. Ind. Med, vol.52, issue.8, pp.645-653, 2009.

L. Godderis, J. Bakusic, and E. Boonen, WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: protocol for systematic reviews of exposure to long working hours and of the effect of exposure to long working hours on alcohol use and alcohol use disorder, Environ. Int, vol.120, pp.22-33, 2018.

L. Hartling, M. P. Hamm, and A. Milne, Testing the risk of bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs, J. Clin. Epidemiol, vol.66, issue.9, pp.973-981, 2013.

J. Higgins and S. Green, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0, 2011.

, The Cochrane Collaboration Available from

J. P. Higgins, D. G. Altman, and P. C. Gotzsche, The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials, BMJ, vol.343, p.5928, 2011.

J. Higgins, J. Jelena-savovi?, M. Page, and J. Sterne, Revised Cochrane Risk-of-bias Tool for Randomized Trials, 2018.

D. Hoy, P. Brooks, and A. Woolf, Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement, J. Clin. Epidemiol, vol.65, issue.9, pp.934-939, 2012.

C. Hulshof, C. Colosio, and I. D. Ivaonv, WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: protocol for systematic reviews of occupational exposure to ergonomic risk factors and of the effect of occupational exposure to ergonomic risk factors on osteoarthritis and other musculoskeletal diseases, Environ. Int, vol.125, pp.554-566, 2019.

, IARC Monograph: Volume 100 C: Arsenic, Metals, Fibres, and Dusts. International Agency for Research on Cancer, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form. n.d, p.12, 2009.

, IPCS Risk Assessment Terminology. World Health Organization, 2004.

A. Iorio, F. A. Spencer, and M. Falavigna, Use of GRADE for assessment of F. Pega, et al, Environment International, vol.135, p.105039, 2015.

, evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients, BMJ, vol.350, p.870

P. I. Johnson, P. Sutton, and D. S. Atchley, The Navigation Guide -evidencebased medicine meets environmental health: systematic review of human evidence for PFOA effects on fetal growth, Environ. Health Perspect, vol.122, issue.10, pp.1028-1039, 2014.

S. J. Kim, K. T. Han, and E. C. Park, Impact of job status on accessibility of cancer screening, Cancer Res. Treat, vol.48, issue.2, pp.825-833, 2016.

D. Krauth, T. J. Woodruff, and L. Bero, Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of published animal studies: a systematic review, Environ. Health Perspect, vol.121, issue.9, pp.985-992, 2013.

J. Lam, P. Sutton, and A. M. Padula, Applying the Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology Case Study #6: Association between Formaldehyde Exposure and Asthma: A Systematic Review of the Evidence: Protocol, 2016.

J. Li, C. Brisson, and E. Clays, WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: protocol for systematic reviews of exposure to long working hours and of the effect of exposure to long working hours on ischaemic heart disease, Environ. Int, vol.119, pp.558-569, 2018.

J. M. Losilla, I. Oliveras, J. A. Marin-garcia, and J. Vives, Three risk of bias tools lead to opposite conclusions in observational research synthesis, J. Clin. Epidemiol, vol.101, pp.61-72, 2018.

D. Mandrioli and E. K. Silbergeld, Evidence from toxicology: the most essential science for prevention, Environ. Health Perspect, vol.124, issue.1, pp.6-11, 2016.

D. Mandrioli, V. Schlünssen, and B. Adam, WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: protocols for systematic reviews of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres and of the effect of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres on pneumoconiosis, Environ. Int, vol.119, pp.174-185, 2018.

R. L. Morgan, K. A. Thayer, and N. Santesso, Evaluation of the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) and the 'target experiment' concept in studies of exposures: rationale and preliminary instrument development, Environ. Int, vol.120, pp.382-387, 2018.

R. L. Morgan, K. A. Thayer, and N. Santesso, A risk of bias instrument for nonrandomized studies of exposures: a users' guide to its application in the context of GRADE, Environ. Int, vol.122, pp.168-184, 2019.

Z. Munn, S. Moola, D. Riitano, and K. Lisy, The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence, Int. J. Health Policy Manag, vol.3, issue.3, pp.123-128, 2014.

Z. Munn, S. Moola, K. Lisy, D. Riitano, and C. Tufanaru, Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data, Int J Evid Based Healthc, vol.13, issue.3, pp.147-153, 2015.

, Office of Health Assessment and Translation. In: Handbook for Conducting a Literature-Based Health Assessment Using OHAT Approach for Systematic Review and Evidence Integration, 2009.

W. R. Ott, A. C. Steinmann, and L. A. Wallace, Exposure Analysis, 2007.

M. S. Paulo, O. C. Akagwu, and I. Y. Akparibo, WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: protocol for systematic reviews of occupational exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation and of the effect of occupational exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation on melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer, Environ. Int, vol.126, pp.804-815, 2019.

M. Porta, A Dictionary of Epidemiology, vol.6, 2014.

A. A. Rooney, G. S. Cooper, and G. D. Jahnke, How credible are the study results? Evaluating and applying internal validity tools to literature-based assessments of environmental health hazards, Environ. Int, pp.617-629, 2016.

R. F. Rugulies, E. Ando, and J. L. Ayuso-mateos, WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: protocol for systematic reviews of exposure to long working hours and of the effect of exposure to long working hours on depression, Environ. Int, vol.125, pp.515-528, 2019.

G. Ryder, Welcome Address From the Director General of the International Labour Organization. XXI World Congress on Safety and Health at Work; 2017. Sands Expo and Convention Centre, 2017.

J. Savovic, L. Weeks, and J. A. Sterne, Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation, p.37, 2014.

J. Sterne, J. Higgins, and B. Reeves, A Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ACROBATNRSI), Version 1.0.0, 24, 2014.

J. A. Sterne, M. A. Hernan, and B. C. Reeves, ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions, BMJ, vol.355, p.4919, 2016.

G. A. Stevens, L. Alkema, and R. E. Black, Guidelines for accurate and transparent health estimates reporting: the GATHER statement, Lancet, vol.388, pp.19-23, 2016.

S. Strauss, D. W. Swanepoel, P. Becker, Z. Eloff, and J. W. Hall-3rd, Noise and agerelated hearing loss: a study of 40 123 gold miners in South Africa, Int. J. Audiol, vol.53, pp.66-75, 2014.

L. R. Teixeira, T. M. Azevedo, and A. T. Bortkiewicz, WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: protocol for systematic reviews of occupational exposure to noise and of the effect of occupational exposure to noise on cardiovascular disease, Environ. Int, vol.125, pp.567-578, 2019.

T. D. Tenkate, M. Paulo, and B. Adam, WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: protocol for systematic reviews of occupational exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation and of the effect of occupational exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation on cataract, Environ. Int, vol.125, pp.542-553, 2019.

, The GATHER Statement: Explanation and Elaboration. World Health Organization, The GATHER Working Group, 2016.

, JBI critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data, 2017.

L. N. Vandenberg, M. Agerstrand, and A. Beronius, A proposed framework for the systematic review and integrated assessment (SYRINA) of endocrine disrupting chemicals, Environ. Health, vol.15, issue.1, p.74, 2016.

M. Viswanathan, M. T. Ansari, and N. D. Berkman, Assessing the risk of bias of individual studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions, Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, 2008.

Z. Wang, K. Taylor, and M. Allman-farinelli, A Systematic Review: Tools for Assessing Methodological Quality of Human Observational Studies, NHMRC Available at, 2019.

G. Wells, B. Shea, and D. O'connell, The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-analyses, 2019.

P. Whaley, C. Halsall, and M. Agerstrand, Implementing systematic review techniques in chemical risk assessment: challenges, opportunities and recommendations, Environ. Int, pp.556-564, 2016.

G. M. Williams, J. M. Najman, and A. Clavarino, Correcting for numerator/denominator bias when assessing changing inequalities in occupational class mortality, Bull. World Health Organ, vol.84, issue.3, pp.198-203, 1981.

T. J. Woodruff and P. Sutton, The Navigation Guide systematic review methodology: a rigorous and transparent method for translating environmental health science into better health outcomes, Environ. Health Perspect, vol.122, issue.10, pp.1007-1014, 2014.

, WHO Human Health Risk Assessment Toolkit: Chemical Hazards. (IPCS Harmonization Project Document, 2010.